Poison pills of all kinds
Many of us would associate poison pills with articles
of an association and their special clauses
that limit voting rights. But the expression poison
pill is just perfect and its usage has expanded to many other unpleasant
surprises as well. Due diligence in particular is designed to detect those pills
and to protect the buyer so that the content of the pill does not puff on
the vendor’s eyes.
Employment
or labor section of a due diligence can appear really boring and
killing when the material comes from a foreign jurisdiction. On surface
labor risk analysis in the form of a due diligence appears local and possible
issues would be handled locally, so why bother. However, one
observation just might have global relevance for an international operation.
Employees’
rights to IPR or their inventions is handled slightly differently
from one country to another. In Finland
the key point to understand is that it is
not possible for the employee to waive his/her rights
to the invention in advance. Such agreement may exist but it cannot
be enforced. It is null and void. A standard solution would be to
agree with the employee on compensation as early as possible, i.e. when the
very first signs of an invention have been identified. For an MA transaction
this is an issue for drafting and calculus, although with a local origin.
Tina Taivaloja, LLM
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti